Skip to main content

Tales of Christmas Past: Preserving Your Family History During the Holidays

Tales of Christmas Past: Preserving Your Family History During the Holidays

(Credit: FG Trade Latin/Getty Images Collection E+)

Contact: Lori Fogleman, Baylor University Media & Public Relations, 254-709-5959
Follow us on X (Twitter): @BaylorUMedia

WACO, Texas (Nov. 29, 2023) – During past family Christmas gatherings, many of us remember when older relatives regaled everyone with tales about their fascinating life stories, firsthand experiences as an eyewitness to history or simply sharing how favorite family traditions started. So how do you preserve those precious family memories during the holidays?

Baylor University oral historians Stephen Sloan and Adrienne Cain Darough have recorded and preserved the oral history memoirs of thousands of individuals through their work with Baylor’s renowned Institute for Oral History, home of the national Oral History Association. Together, the historians share seven simple best practices to help family members begin oral history conversations that enrich recollections of the past and capture your family memories.

“The holiday season brings about the opportunity to spend time with family members, especially those you may not be able to see on a frequent basis. This presents the perfect opportunity to conduct oral histories to capture the stories and experiences of your family and loved ones…” – Adrienne Cain Darough

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

“The holiday season brings about the opportunity to spend time with family members, especially those you may not be able to see on a frequent basis,” Cain Darough said. “This presents the perfect opportunity to conduct oral histories to capture the stories and experiences of your family and loved ones, to learn more about them, the history of your family, traditions that have been passed down from generation to generation and more.”

Seven best practices for preserving your family’s oral history

1. Ask first! Make sure your family member wants their story to be documented or recorded.
photo of Adrienne Cain Darough

Adrienne Cain Darough, M.L.S., assistant director and senior lecturer with Baylor University’s Institute for Oral History.

That is the first – and most important – question to ask, said Adrienne Cain Darough, M.L.S., assistant director and senior lecturer with the Institute for Oral History.

Ask first.

“Many oral historians have run into the spot where someone says, ‘Oh, my grandpa would be great for that topic,’ and you get there and it’s, ‘Grandpa does not want to talk to you.’ So first, make sure they want their story recorded,” she said.

2. Determine the type of recording equipment you want to use.

Decide if you want to record your interview with an audio recorder or use a video recording device. It all depends on your needs and comfort level with the technology.

For family members who are unable to travel this holiday season, you can include them by capturing their stories using a remote recording platform like Zoom, which became a vital tool for oral historians when COVID struck in 2020.

Helpful resources from Baylor’s Institute for Oral History include:

3. Research your family member’s life and their timeline to help you formulate your questions.

Recording a family member’s oral history is more than just putting down a recorder in front of them and saying, “Talk.”

If you’re recording an oral history over Christmas with a family member, are there specific things that you want to know that are related to the holiday? For example, what was Christmas morning like for them as a child? How did your favorite family traditions start? What is their favorite holiday dish? (Maybe they could even share the recipe. “You can finally learn why Nana’s banana pudding doesn’t even have bananas in it,” Cain Darough said.)

“Doing your research to try to form those questions will help you get around the reluctance to talk sometimes,” Cain Darough added. “The favorite thing that I love to hear is, ‘Oh, I don’t have much to say,’ or ‘I’m not that important.’ And then you sit down with them, and you listen to their stories, and your mind is just blown by the things that they’ve seen and experienced.”

4. Start with the basics: “Where are you from?”

When Baylor oral historians conduct an interview, they generally begin with some life history of the subject, providing important context for historians.

Photo of Dr. Stephen Sloan

Stephen Sloan, Ph.D., professor of history and director of Baylor University’s Institute for Oral History.

“Ask questions early on that are easy for them to answer: a little bit of the backstory, a little bit of where they’re from, where they grew up,” said Stephen Sloan, Ph.D., director of the Institute for Oral History, executive director of Oral History Association and professor of history at Baylor. “I want to understand the lens through which they experienced events, and the only way I can do that is, who was this? What was formative in their life growing up? Who spoke into who they were? What did they learn? Where did they go? What did they do? Those are the sorts of things that I would be exploring early in the interview.”

One of the questions Cain Darough enjoys asking is, “What did you want to be when you grew up?”

“You want to give them something that’s very easy and comfortable to talk about,” Cain Darough said. “What was your favorite subject in school, just to see if that was something that continued on in their life. If there’s a certain hobby or something that you know that they’re affiliated with, when did you learn about that? Tell me more. What’s your interest with this? And then they’ll get to talking.”

5. Ask open-ended questions – without making any assumptions.

With oral history, it is important that you don’t go into the interview with a specific agenda or try to lead anyone to a certain conclusion.

“We can do this very subtly by assuming information, but you can’t assume anything about their experience with the topic,’” Sloan said. “If we assume information, it could be very far from how they encountered whatever event that may have been. Allow them to relate the ways in which they lived these experiences.”

6. Listen closely.

Listening is an important facet of gathering oral history. But historians say you are not only listening for what they’re saying, you’re also listening for what they’re not saying.

“Are there things that are being skipped around?” Cain Darough said. “For example, sometimes when you’re talking to veterans about their combat experience, it may be the first time that they’re reliving or retelling these stories. They need time, and you just have to be prepared for that.”

7. Be patient. It might take your subject some time to warm up to the conversation.

“If you’re talking to someone who is 80, 90 or even 100, that’s a lot of memories that they have to go through, so patience is important,” Cain Darough said.

ABOUT STEPHEN SLOAN AND ADRIENNE A. CAIN DAROUGH

In summer 2024, Stephen Sloan and Adrienne A. Cain Darough, along with oral history colleagues Steven K. Sielaff and Michelle L. Holland, will release their book, Oral History at a Distance (Routledge Press), that addresses the dynamics of conducting remote oral history interviews, including the interview/narrator experience, best practices and equipment and software needed for recording remote archival-quality oral history interviews, and the legal and ethical considerations and implications of oral histories conducted via distance interviewing.

Stephen Sloan leads Baylor’s Institute for Oral History, one of the leading academic oral history programs in the world providing best principles and practices for the methodology. Sloan also serves as executive director of the Oral History Association, the principal membership organization for people committed to the value of oral history, and as a professor in Baylor’s Department of History, specializing in U.S. history post 1941, environmental history, public history and the American West. Through the Institute, Sloan organizes research projects, leads community oral history workshops, directs grants and contracts and conducts field interviews. He has won several awards for his publications and projects, including the Elizabeth B. Mason Oral History Project Award for the “Survivors of Genocide Oral History Project” and the Oral History Association Book Award for the co-edited Listening on the Edge: Oral History in the Aftermath of Crisis. Sloan’s public history work includes the Waco History app and website and the Waco History Podcast.

Adrienne A. Cain Darough is a librarian, oral historian and certified archivist who currently serves as the assistant director of the Institute for Oral History and senior lecturer at Baylor. In this role she supports the Institute by providing training and workshops to community groups, students, educators and researchers who desire to create an oral history project for their neighborhoods, classrooms, communities and research. In addition, she serves the oral history profession as the secretary-treasurer for the Texas Oral History Association. As an oral historian, she has worked on several projects as a trainer, creator and consultant. She has presented her work and research on oral history use and methodology at several regional, national and international associations. Her oral history projects, research and interests center around ethical and legal considerations for oral history as well as the Black/African American experience as told through oral histories.

ABOUT THE BAYLOR UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE FOR ORAL HISTORY

Through dynamic, recorded interviews, the Institute for Oral History at Baylor University preserves the stories of individuals who helped create the fabric of history and whose lives, in turn, were shaped by the people, places, events and ideas of their day. The Institute has recorded and preserved oral histories since 1970, earning along the way a strong reputation for multidisciplinary outreach to both academic scholars and community historians by providing professional leadership, educational tools and research opportunities. In 2019, the Institute joined the Baylor University Libraries, further strengthening the division for service to researchers and scholars. For more information, visit the Institute for Oral History website.

Thanks for reading Capturing Voices! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

Earliest known writing dates back over 40,000 years

Stone Age artifacts in Germany are editing writing’s timeline.

Previously, the oldest known human writing was from Mesopotamia, about 3000 years ago! This is pretty rudimentary writing, but we do copy editing, and you’d be surprised at how rudimentary today’s writing is! We post funny AI mistakes periodically! Watch this space for more!

Andrew Paul

Published Feb 23, 2026 3:00 PM EST

The Adorant figurine from Geißenklösterle Cave, approximately 38,000 years old, consists of a small ivory plate bearing an anthropomorphic figure and multiple sequences of notches and dots. The application of these marks suggests a notational system, most notably in the rows of dots on the back of the plate.

The Adorant figurine from Geißenklösterle Cave, approximately 38,000 years old, consists of a small ivory plate bearing an anthropomorphic figure and multiple sequences of notches and dots. The application of these marks suggests a notational system, most notably in the rows of dots on the back of the plate. Credit: Landesmuseum Württemberg / Hendrik Zwietasch

New evidence published today in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences indicates humans experimented with symbolic writing as much as 40,000 years ago. If true, the discoveries dramatically recontextualize the history of communication, given the earliest known written languages are Mesopotamian proto-cuneiforms dating back to around 3000 BCE.

“The artifacts date back to tens of thousands of years before the first writing systems, to the time when Homo sapiens left Africa, settled in Europe, and encountered Neanderthal,” explained Ewa Dutkiewicz, a study co-author and archaeologist at Berlin’s Museum of Prehistory and Early History.

Dutkiewicz and colleagues have spent years analyzing 260 relics recovered from Stone Age cave sites in the Swabian Jura, a remote mountain range located in southwestern Germany. These include a small mammoth figurine carved from the extinct animal’s tusk along with the Adorant, a famous ivory carving that appears to depict a human-lion figure with outstretched arms. These and many other similar artifacts also feature frequently repeating sequences of lines, crosses, dots, and notches.

The mammoth figurine from Vogelherd Cave, approximately 40,000 years old, bears multiple sequences of crosses and dots on its surface.

The mammoth figurine from Vogelherd Cave, approximately 40,000 years old, bears multiple sequences of crosses and dots on its surface. Credit: Universität Tübingen / Hildegard Jensen

The team then entered over 3,000 geometric carvings into a Stone Age sign database, and examined them using various computational analysis tools. They didn’t expect to translate any of the messages, but instead used the analysis to compare and contrast their attributes with writing systems that developed later.

“There are plenty of theories, but until now there has been very little empirical work carried out on the basic, measurable characteristics of the signs,” added Christian Bentz, a study co-author from Germany’s Saarland University.

Bentz explained that using methods like quantitative linguistics and statistical modeling allowed them to compare the symbols found on the Paleolithic artifacts to early cuneiform, as well as modern writing formats. With this approach, they could estimate just how much information could be contained within the carved symbols.

“The human ability to encode information in signs and symbols was developed over many thousands of years. Writing is only one specific form in a long series of sign systems,” he said. “We continue to develop new systems for encoding information. Encoding is also the basis of computer systems.”

The results surprised researchers. Although they initially theorized the proto-cuneiform would share more similarities to present-day writing systems, it seems that the Mesopotamian communication method looks more like its Stone Age ancestors. This means that writing may have changed very little for tens of thousands of years. While the exact meanings of Paleolithic Germany’s artifacts remain a mystery, the team is confident it does not represent any spoken language.

“The signs on the archaeological objects are frequently repeated–cross, cross, cross, line, line, line. This type of repetition is not a feature found in spoken language,” said Bentz.

The team can also now begin narrowing the scope of possible interpretations. The discoveries also highlight that in terms of cognitive capabilities, Stone Age humans had already achieved a similar capacity to the present-day descendents.

“There are many sign sequences to be found on artifacts. We’ve only just scratched the surface,” said Dutkiewicz.

Editor’s note: Think he MEANT that to be a pun?

Thanks for reading Capturing Voices! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

Voices of Cuba: An Oral History Journey

Voices of Cuba: An Oral History Journey

The Oral History Association is pleased to share an upcoming travel opportunity to Cuba, led by Travel Cuba With Us. January 3–10, 2027 Havana • Soroa • Trinidad • Topes de Collantes • Playa Ancón This 8-day / 7-night journey is rooted in the belief that every journey can be a form of profound listening. […]

VOCES Oral History Summer Institute (Application Deadline 3/16)

VOCES Oral History Summer Institute (Application Deadline 3/16)

This workshop is for faculty and graduate students wishing to use oral history in research and teaching and is helpful to the beginner, intermediate and advanced scholar. Instructors have created oral history projects, published widely using oral history, and are leaders in oral history publishing and teaching. Participants meet in break-out groups with the institute directors to workshop […]

Preauthorization for traditional Medicare

image

The Trump Administration is introducing Preauthorization for traditional Medicare, even though it is the item most consumers find as most burdensome in our healthcare system.

Here are the items selected for review this year. I could find no justification for this selection other than “The WISeR Model tests the use of enhanced technology to decrease certain wasteful (low-value) services shown to have little to no clinical, evidence-based benefit. Technology companies participating in the model help streamline the review of medical necessity for select items and services earlier in the claims process to: 1) reduce inappropriate utilization, 2) lower spending in Original Medicare, 3) expedite decision making and(4) ease provider administrative burden.”

Who has shown these items to have no clinical, evidence-based benefit? RFK Jr?

1. Arthroscopic Lavage and Arthroscopic Debridement for the Osteoarthritic Knee (NCD 150.9)

2. Induced Lesions of Nerve Tracts (NCD 160.1)

3. Vagus Nerve Stimulation (NCD 160.18)

4. Phrenic Nerve Stimulators (NCD 160.19)

5. Electrical Nerve Stimulators (NCD 160.7)

6. Incontinence Control Devices (NCD 230.10)

7. Sacral Nerve Stimulators for Urinary Incontinence (NCD 230.18)

8. Diagnosis and Treatment of Impotence (NCD 230.4)

9. Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation for Vertebral Compression Fracture (L34228, L38201, L35130)

10. Epidural Steroid Injections for Pain Management (L39015, L39240, L36920)

11. Cervical Fusion (L39741, L39758, L39793)

12. Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea (L38307, L38310, L38385)

13. Application of Bioengineered Skin Substitutes to Lower Extremity Chronic Non-Healing Wounds (L35041) and Wound Application of Cellular and/or Tissue Based Products (CTPs), Lower Extremities (L36690)

14. Deep Brain Stimulation (NCD 160.24) – implementation delayed and will not occur on January 1, 2026; to be re-evaluated for implementation in a future performance year

15. Percutaneous Image-Guided Lumbar Decompression for Spinal Stenosis (NCD 150.13) – implementation delayed and will not occur on January 1, 2026; to be re-evaluated for implementation in a future performance year.

Thanks for reading Capturing Voices! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.